Printer friendly
version of this article - PDF file uses Adobe Acrobat reader.
![]()
CONDUCTING A RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CONFERENCE
In any developed society, criminal justice processes sit within the wider ambit of social justice and the need to develop, enhance and protect the common good. Social justice covers racial, sexual, ethnic, social and religious dimensions of life into which criminal justice integrally fits.
One of the major reasons why retributive justice procedures have become counter productive is that they are too often separated out from their context as one part only of the many parts of social justice.
It is apparent that the retributive criminal justice processes we follow so slavishly through our policing and court systems are failing both offenders and the victims of crime. The community is the poorer for this in the end. The reasons for this are obvious. The whole philosophy and approach is based primarily on vengeance and punishment and provide little by way of positive help to anyone involved, least of all victims. Prisons are not called ‘universities of crime’ for no good reason.
Restorative justice has come to be seen as a much fuller and more productive processes of conflict resolution, especially in relation to crime, and a better way of conducting criminal justice processes. It is promoted as a parallel process to sit alongside the current court-based system, which remains a useful tool where the conditions for restorative justice are not present.
Justice is based on precepts which protect, enhance and develop the common good of the wider community. Without seeking the common good, one cannot achieve social justice. Such justice is only achieved when FOUR basic principles are fulfilled.
# The principle of Solidarity.
This recognises that we are all brothers and sisters of one another, made in the image and likeness of God. No one individual or grouping is sub-human. This was the claim of the Nazis about gypsies, homosexuals, Jews, radicals, communists. It was the claim of the apartheid regime about black South Africans. It sits at the root of all major acts of genocide in history.
# The principle of Subsidiarity.
This recognises that everyone has gifts and talents which need to develop, and no one has the right to crush the potential of an individual to develop particular skills and gifts. Such gifts are for the good of the whole community. Authoritarian and dictatorial social structures are usually the antithesis of subsidiarity.
# The protection of Human Rights.
This principle, which appears now to be self evident but was not always so, recognises that people are entitled by their very nature as human beings to basic rights. Sufficient food, shelter, medical care, education, family support, freedom of movement and association are among the most basic human rights.
# The protection of the poor, the disadvantaged, the vulnerable, the sick.
Every society has such people among its members. No society can claim to be socially just if it neglects any of these groups. Many among such people are unable to look after themselves adequately. A just society takes care of such people.
These four principles can be seen as four legs on a racehorse. If one or two of the horse’s legs is lame, then the horse cannot function as a racehorse should. All four legs have to be healthy and utilised. The requirements of social justice cannot be met if all four principles are not acknowledged. Injustice will prevail.
Crime violates the state and law
The state owns the conflict
Justice focuses on establishing guilt
The process is adversarial
It seeks punishment
The outcome is measured by who wins and loses
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
Crime violates people and relationships
Victims and offenders have the central roles
Justice seeks to identify needs, obligations and responsibilities
The process is through dialogue and mutual agreement
It seeks restoration and repair wherever possible
Outcome is measured by responsibilities assumed, needs met and healing attained1
Restorative justice is a PROCESS, preferably community-based, which
# seeks to repair damage or fix harm done
# provides a better deal for victims
# encourages offenders to take responsibility for their behaviour
# provides opportunity to begin a healing process
# can offer more practical sanctions when appropriate
# allows the possibility of forgiveness and reconciliation to begin
# can help to gradually reduce prison numbers
There are EIGHT simple Ground Rules which should apply to all conferences
How does an RJ Conference work?
There are three important parts to a conference – preparation, the conference and follow-up.
This is considered a very important part. If it is not done properly, things can easily go wrong during the conference. There are SIX stages to it.
The plan of action is referred to the court. It is up to the court to make sure any plan of action is implemented, but the facilitators’ group or the facilitator personally may be involved with this if requested.
1 Howard Zehr, Changing Lenses, Herald Press, Scotdale, PA 1990.
Printer friendly
version of this article - PDF file uses Adobe Acrobat reader.
![]()
Some articles written by Jim Consedine
Is there are Place for Forgiveness in Restorative Justice?
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE - A LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS
Christian Morality, Restorative Justice and the Law
A HARSH REALITY - A MERCIFUL RESPONSE
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE – CREATIVE PEACEMAKING
Here are a couple of Restorative Justice websites you might like to explore. I'm sure there are a lot more around. Real Justice - A US private corporation doing Restorative Justice on a big scale - www.realjustice.org The NZ one is www.restorativejustice.org.nz
|
Conducting a restorative justice conference A newspaper article Punishment doesn't pay: priest Also find much more by searching for restorative justice on http://google.com
|
|
Please be responsible for your interaction with any persons or organizations mentioned on this site.
|